Monday, December 27, 2010

How the WTC Demolitions Were Set Up

Tuesday, December 28th, 9-10 a.m. Pacific (noon - 1 pm Eastern) on, to be archived here a few hours after broadcast...

Guest: Evelien Gilbert (check out her blog!), SFX engineer/modelmaker. "My interest in 3d software was based on having to make models and move objects in the real world to be filmed and used in a virtual world."

Evelien recently sent Richard Gage and me a paper, still in the beta stage, entitled "Demolition sequences and the willful suspension of disbelief: Analyzing the 911 storyboard." Below are some excerpts:


When the events of 911 took place I was working as a Special Effects model maker and engineer in Europe. Together with my husband I owned a small Special Effects company with max. 15 employees at times and as such was very involved with the analysis and translation of literally hundreds of story boards. Storyboards are a series of little drawings showing key frames in a film in order to tell the intended story to prospective clients, film crew etc. ...

This paper attempts to analyze the events of 911 from a SFX professional point of view based on 18 years of experience in storyboard analysis, real world Special Effects preparation and film experience...

1. The demolition sequences of 911 were based a story board.

The sequence of events after the artist conceives of an idea like this is as follows:
a. Storyboard drawing attention to key frames. (setting up the storyline)
b. Analysis by SFX team
c. Translation into real world possibilities
d. Preparation
e. Execution on film set, in theatre or as the case may be in New York and Washington

* * *

2. The preparation of the demolition sequences of the three towers was done with software I believe to have been available before 2001 reducing the need for huge numbers of planners and making a number of different demolition sequences available on the day itself...

Blastcode is a software package advertised curiously enough as a module for Maya specialised in the virtual simulation of demolitions and destruction sequences for clients as diverse as: Motion picture, Broadcasting, Video game, Military and defence industries. It's tagline is: Destruction at your finger tips!

I don't know when Blastcode was conceived and it only was presented to the civilian world in 2004 but that does not mean that the software wasn't in existence before that day...

Friday, December 17, 2010

Christopher Bollyn, Monfils Conspiracy on TJ Radio!

Truth Jihad Radio Sat. 12/18/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page.

First hour: Christopher Bollyn, author of Solving 9/11 - the most comprehensive book on Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks. Christopher Bollyn has just made public new evidence concerning the destruction of 9/11 evidence. He writes:

I look forward to discussing the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center on Saturday, December 18. I am sending you the following information so that you understand the basics of what I will be talking about. To understand the Mossad role in the destruction of the steel from the WTC is to understand a very crucial part of the 9/11 crime. I posted a piece that discusses the Mossadniks who ran the international trading network at Hugo Neu Schnitzer. These two Mossad punks, Nathan Fruchter and Jehuda Saar, had worked for Marc Rich at Glencore AG and other companies he ran in Stamford, Connecticut since the mid-1990s. Hugo Neu is the company that recycled much of the steel from the World Trade Center by sending it to Chinese mills where it was melted. The article is here> There is much more to Hugo Neu's connection to the Mossad. Hugo Neu, which was created by the current owner's father, who was originally working with Walter Rothschild and Meno Lippauer when they all came from Germany, is an investor in this Mossad venture capital fund: AquaAgroFund One of the managing partners of the AquaAgroFund is Nir Belzer, who is co-founder of the Millenium Material Technologies Funds. Which he founded with Oren Gafri, who specializes in military applications of thin coatings, exactly like what was used at the World Trade Center on 9/11 I hope to be able to get the chapter on this subject written in the next few days.

Second hour: The Monfils Conspiracy author Denis Gullickson; framed-for-murder-then-exonerated Mike Piaskowski; and Cal Monfils, brother of murder victim Tom Monfils. (Note: I have devoted two shows to this topic, but this will be the first one with Cal Monfils, whose courage and sense of justice have led him to revisit the case of his brother's murder.)

Wisconsin has had its share of miscarriages of justice. Take Joe McCarthy's anti-leftist witch-hunts...or the case of a certain University of Wisconsin instructor forced out by a crackpot state legislator for speaking the truth about 9/11 -- a truth that nobody in either the legislature or the entire University of Wisconsin system is willing to challenge in a free and fair debate, but which remains politically "unspeakable" in the land of fearless sifting and winnowing.

Okay, so I thought I had it bad...until I read The Monfils Conspiracy: The Conviction of Six Innocent Men. This book shows how six innocent workers at Green Bay's James River Paper Mill were falsely convicted of murder in a surreal, witch-hunt-style mass trial back in 1995. Five of them are still rotting in jail for the crime of refusing to lie at the behest of out-of-control cops and prosecutors. The sixth, Mike Piaskowski, was exonerated and released in 2001, and will (I hope) be appearing on the show, along with Monfils Conspiracy author Denis Gullickson.

If you've seen The Thin Blue Line, or studied the frame-ups of Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, Sirhan Sirhan, and/or the alleged 9/11 hijackers, you know how the innocent can be painted as guilty, and the guilty as innocent, based on emotionally-engaging stories fed to or latched onto by investigators, prosecutors, the media, and/or the matter how ridiculous the story, and no matter how wildly it clashes with the facts. The Monfils Conspiracy documents that this is precisely what happened to Dale Basten, Mike Hern, Mike Johnson, Keith Kutska, Ray Moore, and Mike "Mike Pie" Piaskowski: The cops started with a good story, to which they immediately became emotionally attached; and they subsequently bulldogged that story into six false convictions in the teeth of overwhelming countervailing evidence. We need to study these cases and learn from them to counteract our natural tendency to make this kind of mistake. And above all, we need to get these five guys out of prison.

Monday, December 13, 2010

Does Islam Discriminate in Favor of Women?

Note: This show was postponed due to technical problems at NoLiesRadio. It has been rescheduled for Tuesday, December 21st, 9-10 a.m. Pacific.

Tuesday, December 14th (rescheduled for the 21st) , 9-10 a.m. Pacific (noon - 1 pm Eastern) on, to be archived here a few hours after broadcast...

Abdul Rahman Mojahed, author of Superior Woman, Inferior Man in Islam argues that the fair sex gets more than a fair deal in Islam - it's the men who ought to be complaining ; - )

Does this partly explain why women are converting to Islam even faster than men?

If you're thinking of marrying a Muslima, insist on full disclosure concerning rights and responsibilities. Here's what she may tell you: "First, you're going to have to give me a mahr - a bridal gift, a.k.a. dowry. In our middle-class social circles a mere $10,000 or $20,000 should suffice. Then you'll need to put on a wedding that lasts for a week and feeds most of the city - that's another 30 or 40 k. Once we're married, you will be expected to support me and our children in the style to which we are accustomed. I will have the right to work and to earn or inherit as much of my own money as I want, but I won't be obliged to pay a penny to support the household - you'll have to do that. If I choose not to work - and frankly, I would rather hang out with my friends, and do some cooking and housework, than slave away in an office or at Wal-Mart - I have the right to stay home and be taken care of. As a Muslim man, you will be expected to lower your gaze and not look at other women. You'll have to serve me, protect me, and treat me kindly and lovingly at all times. You'll have to run to the store whenever I ask you, and --"

"Wait a minute, habibati! What's in this for us guys?"

"Under Islam, you are absolutely prohibited from even looking - much less enjoying - unless you are married."

"Uh...okay, let's hurry up and set that wedding date!"

Does this sound like a system that benefits men and oppresses women?! So how come Westerners have it backward?

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Truth Jihad Radio exclusive: "A person in my family was involved in 9/11"

Truth Jihad Radio Sat. 12/11/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page.

Why can't Wikileaks, with all its amazing resources, break any 9/11 stories? It's not like it's all that hard. This Saturday, 12/11/10, I'll be breaking two!

Rushing in where Assange fears to tread, I will be interviewing two people who have had to live with the emotionally devastating reality of knowing that people they are/were close to are 9/11 criminals.

My first hour guest, Witness #1, says it flat-out: "A person in my family was involved in 9/11."

[Note: The scheduled first-hour guest did not appear. We are trying to reschedule.)

My second-hour guest, Witness #2, was shocked and traumatized upon learning of smoking-gun evidence that former colleagues were involved in the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.

I have met both of these people in person. Both are unusually well-educated (they've done doctoral work) and palpably sincere. Both have been devastated by the knowledge that people they were close to are 9/11-complicit. Both have been hesitant to come forward for various reasons, including concern for their own safety. (I will be discussing matters with one of these witnesses that, not long ago, s/he begged me not to discuss publicly: "You want to get me killed?" As for the other witness, this will be his/her first-ever public statement.)

Those who would prefer that this information not be aired should know that it is already in the hands of several people, and that any action taken against either of my radio guests would only serve to publicize it and underline its veracity.

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Pearl Harbor Day Special! Thomas Kimmel on the KB Show, ONE HOUR EARLY!

Tuesday, December 7th, 8-9 a.m. Pacific (11 a.m. - noon Eastern) on, to be archived here a few hours after broadcast...

Thomas Kimmel has taken up the fight to clear the name of his grandfather, Admiral Husband Edward Kimmel, Commander-in-Chief of the US Pacific Fleet at the time of the Pearl Harbor attack. Admiral Kimmel, along with Gen. Walter Short, were set up as Pearl Harbor scapegoats by the murderous traitors - including President FD Roosevelt and ONI Lt. Commander Arthur McCollum - who orchestrated the Pearl Harbor butchery. In fact, Kimmel and Short were heroes. They were known as men of integrity, and were therefore left out of the loop of traitors who were scheming to sacrifice American lives in order to drag the American people into a war they wanted no part of.

The truth is fully-documented in Robert Stinnett's Day of Deceit: McCollum and FDR implemented an eight-point plan to force the Japanese to attack, closely monitored Japanese preparations for the "surprise" attack on Pearl harbor, knew exactly when and where the attack was coming, and intentionally placed thousands of defenseless sailors in harm's way. The Pearl Harbor massacre was a classic war-trigger event designed to enrage U.S. public opinion - which was running 85% against US entry into WWII - and allow Roosevelt to bring America into the global mass slaughter of more than 60 million innocent people. A viler act of treason and homicide could hardly be imagined.

And yet it not only was imagined - it was implemented. Pearl Harbor high treason set a precedent for the even more treasonous Zionist neocons, who arranged the 9/11 inside job as a "New Pearl Harbor" designed to launch a permanent US war on Islam for Israel. (For some brand-new details about how it was done, check out Gordon Duff's interview with an insider.)

* * *

from my book Questioning the War on Terror:

The Straussian neocon big-liars see themselves as “architects of
the lores and legends of society.”54

Are they the architects of the house (or cage) we now inhabit,
the War on Terror—the collection of lores and legends around
which our post-9/11 political life revolves?

A key War on Terror architect is Philip Zelikow, the main author
of the 9/11 Commission Report. Zelikow describes himself as a
specialist in “the construction and maintenance of public myths”
which he describes as “beliefs (1) thought to be true (although
not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared
in common with the relevant political community.” Zelikow is
especially interested in “’searing’ or ‘molding’ events that take
on ‘transcendent’ importance and, therefore, retain their power
even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene.”55 He
co-authored a 1998 article in Foreign Affairs analyzing the likely
political, psychological, and cultural reaction to a massive Pearl
Harbor-style terrorist event such as the destruction of the World
Trade Center.56 How did he foresee the near future so accurately?
And why was a man with such a background, whose apparent
foreknowledge made him a potential suspect, put in charge of the

Other key neocon War on Terror architects include Paul
Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Dick Cheney, Douglas Feith, Scooter
Libby, and Donald Rumsfeld—all members of Project for the New
American Century (PNAC), which called for a “New Pearl Harbor”
in a document issued in September, 2000. They insisted in that
document that the U.S. needed to drastically increase its military
budget, launch wars of aggression (euphemistically referred
to as “pre-emptive” wars) in the Middle East, remove Saddam
Hussein from power in Iraq, and adapt an aggressive new imperial
strategy. “The process of transformation is likely to be a long one,”
they wrote one year before 9/11, “absent some cataclysmic and
catalyzing event—like a New Pearl Harbor.”57
Was 9/11 a “New Pearl Harbor”?

Many scholars believe that President Franklin D. Roosevelt lied
about the alleged surprise attack on Pearl Harbor—and that the lie
was a justifiable “noble lie.” Before Pearl Harbor, American public
opinion was overwhelmingly against U.S. entry into the war. Pearl
Harbor, some believe, made it possible for the U.S.A. to defeat
Hitler. Did Roosevelt manipulate the Japanese with an eight-point
plan to force Japan to strike first so as to enrage the American
people and allow U.S. entry into the war? Did he know about the
attack beforehand and intentionally fail to prevent it? Did he make
it happen on purpose by way of the eight-point plan?58

Paul Wolfowitz, a student of Strauss and leading neocon
geopolitical strategist, has long been fascinated by the immense
strategic value of Pearl Harbor, which mobilized America for total
war. Wolfowitz has exhibited a lifelong obsession with a remark by
Albert Speer to the effect that if Germany had been blessed with a
Pearl Harbor it would have won World War II.59

If the official myth of the Pearl Harbor surprise attack is a lie, is
it a noble lie? Wolfwitz, and the other cult followers of Leo Strauss,
would undoubtedly say so.

The popular myth of the dastardly Japanese surprise attack
on Pearl Harbor, and the heroic American response, transformed
Americans’ understanding of themselves and their role in the
world. Before Pearl Harbor, Americans agreed that there should be
no standing army, and that George Washington’s foreign policy of
neutrality, non-alignment, and non-involvment in foreign quarrels
was the American way.60 That is why, on the eve of Pearl Harbor,
85% of Americans opposed entering World War II.

After Pearl Harbor, Americans accepted their new role as the
world’s policeman (some would say the world’s biggest bully).
A gigantic military-industrial complex mushroomed, and more
noble lies were told to gain the people’s consent. The negligible
military threat to the U.S. posed by the Soviet Union was wildly
exaggerated in order to pump up the military budget, and the
memory of the alleged sneak attack at Pearl Harbor fed Americans’
sense of vulnerability. In this way, an aggressive imperial strategy
was made to appear defensive. While pretending to be a purely
defensive power, the U.S. regularly threatened other nations with
the use of nuclear weapons.61 It launched illegal, unconstitutional
attacks on dozens of nations that posed no threat whatsoever, killing
millions of innocent people in the process in what one scholar of
U.S. empire, William Blum, has called “the American holocaust.”62

The Pearl Harbor myth changed history. It turned the U.S.A.
from a peace-loving nation into the world’s biggest and most
aggressive military empire. How did it exert such immense power?

To find out, the U.S. military hired anthropologist Bob
Deutch, one of the world’s leading experts in using focus
groups to understand and manipulate irrational popular beliefs.
Deutch discovered that Pearl Harbor shattered Americans’ sense
of invulnerability: “Because Japan disrupted America’s selfmythology
of being invincible, the nation would never be forgiven
in the irrational American sentiment.”63 Could those who hired
Deutch have concluded that a new Pearl Harbor, blamed on Arab
Muslims, could provide the kind of “searing or moulding event”
that would convince the American public to mobilize for wars on
behalf of oil and Israel?

Deutch discovered that at the deep psychological level, the
American public, like members of the Hells Angels motorcycle
gang, engages in aggression as a defense against a sense of
vulnerability and loss: “They are protecting themselves. That’s
what their core story is about. Images are created to defend loss,
not maximize gain.”64

Another U.S. military psychological expert, S.L.A. Marshall,
discovered just how fundamentally defensive and non-aggressive
human nature really is, and how powerfully people must be
psychologically manipulated if they are to go to war. After an
exhaustive study of that vast majority U.S. infantrymen and airmen
who, during World War II, covertly refused to kill, Marshall wrote
that “the average and healthy individual...has such an inner and
usually unrealized resistance towards killing a fellow man that he
will not of his own volition take life if it is possible to turn away
from that responsibility...At the vital point (the soldier) becomes
a conscientious objector.”65

Normal human beings only kill when
under direct threat and extreme duress, as a fear-and-anger-inspired
defensive response to an aggressor. To motivate a nation to engage
in military aggression—mass killing abroad—the people must be
brainwashed into believing that they are under attack.

Zbigniew Brezezinski, a leading U.S. foreign policy strategist,
notes that the U.S. public’s attitude toward the “external projection
of American power” is “ambivalent” and depends on the sort of fear
and vulnerability awakened by Pearl Harbor: “The public supported
America’s engagement in World War II largely because of the shock
effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.”66

Brezezinski’s useof the term “shock effect” recalls the thesis of Naomi Klein’s
The Shock Doctrine.67 According to Klein, individuals and even
whole societies can be forced to accept radical, unpleasant changes
by way of sudden shocks engineered, or taken advantage of, by
unscrupulous elites.

Brezezinski seemed to be calling for a shocking event like
9/11 and the War on Terror it spawned, when he wrote in 1997:
“Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multicultural
society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on
foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive
and widely perceived direct external threat.”68

Hollywood, like Brezezinski, seemed to be preparing the
American public for 9/11. The run-up to 9/11 saw a rash of patriotic,
militaristic, apocalyptic films including the 135 million dollar
flop, Pearl Harbor.69 Most American-made action films feature an
American hero who is threatened by an evil foreigner, and whose
self-defense unfolds into extreme aggression that the audience is
taught to accept as legitimate. A grossly disproportionate number
of Hollywood’s evil foreigners are Arab or Muslim, including in
pre-9/11 films.70 Is this because Hollywood was founded as, and
remains, a Jewish enclave with a strong pro-Israeli bias? Or is it
because 80% of the world’s sweet, easily-extracted oil lies under
Arab and Muslim sand, even as an age of energy scarcity looms?71

Did 9/11 function as a “new Pearl Harbor” that mobilized
Americans for a aggressive war, disguised as a defensive one,
against Arab and Muslim countries? T.H. Meyer has called
attention to Donald Rumsfeld’s bizarre Pearl Harbor propaganda
campaign that had begun even before the Bush Administration
took office.72 Rumsfeld spent 2000 and 2001 carrying around
extra copies of Roberta Wohlstetter’s Pearl Harbor: Warning and
Decision, praising the book to the skies, and offering free copies to
journalists. (Wohlstetter’s hawkish Zionist husband Albert, named
in his obituary “the world’s most influential unknown figure of the
past half century,” was Wolfowitz’s mentor and Richard Perle’s
father-in-law.)73 Roberta Wohlstetter’s Pearl Harbor book, while
it ostensibly supports the official myth that Pearl Harbor was a
perfidious surprise attack, includes enough information to the
contrary to enlighten the discerning reader to the unspeakable
but implicitly acknowledged truth: The Roosevelt Administration
provoked the attacks, knew they were coming, and left thousands
of sailors in harm’s way as an offering to the gods of war.
Wohlstetter’s book is a perfect illustration of neocon doublespeak:
Tell a vivid, simplistic, emotionally-charged lie to the masses
(“Perfidious surprise attack! Heroic purple-fury response!”) yet
include as a subtle subtext the unspeakable truth that only the elite
is smart enough to discern and strong enough to handle: Roosevelt
sacrificed thousands of American lives to the greater good of
getting the U.S. into the war.

Rumsfeld’s pre-9/11 Pearl Harbor precognitions were echoed
on 9/11 itself. On Air Force One, as Bush flew from Florida to
Nebraska, the event was already being framed as a new Pearl
Harbor.74 Senator Chuck Hegel and Henry Kissinger quickly
echoed the Pearl Harbor comparison. Brezezinski himself
pronounced: “It (9/11) is more murderous even than Pearl Harbor,
and the psychological impact is the same.”75 On the evening of
September 11th, 2001, George W. Bush reportedly confided to his
diary: “The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today.”76

Before the nano-thermite-laden dust77 that was all that was
left of the World Trade Center had cleared, the corporate media
were echoing the Pearl Harbor meme. Time Magazine wrote:
“What’s needed is a unified, unifying, Pearl Harbor sort of purple
American fury—a ruthless indignation that doesn’t leak away in
a week or two.”78 After 9/11 family members shamed a reluctant
administration into finally mounting an official investigation, the
9/11 Commission told us that 9/11 was just like Pearl Harbor
“except it wasn’t the Japanese, but it was al-Qaeda.”79

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

TJ Radio Sat. Dec. 4th: Are the Banksters Killing America...or the World?

Truth Jihad Radio Sat. 12/4/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page.

First hour: Peter Hebert, author of Mortgaged and Armed and the forthcoming Predator Nation. (See below.)

Second hour: 9/11 researcher and social credit advocate Dick Eastman, whose analysis of the Pentagon attack was a source for David Ray Griffin's The New Pearl Harbor (while anticipating and supporting the work of CIT and Barbara Honegger).

"Barbara Honegger has proven the false-flag, inside-job, provocateur, and false-victimhood establishing nature of the attack on the Pentagon. Her findings are as conclusive -- if not more so -- than my own -- yet she is one of the investigators that 'Big Truth' investigators avoid interviewing or featuring in documentaries, books or organized public forums. The best people in any field -- detective work, government, social science, history -- are always the ones that the big-mouths and the Big Truth organizers are directing you away from." - Dick Eastman

* * *
From Peter Herbert's emails:

My third book, Predator Nation (late Spring 2011), is more complex than Mortgaged and Armed (July 4, 2010) and The Collapse of Home Prices and the Foreclosure Crisis (late Winter 2011). Predator Nation is financial and economic history and ties together the 1930s and 1940s with the present. The opening and concluding chapters are book ends that tie everything together and support my thesis - the strategic aspects of the financial sector's war and the corporation as the fifth column within the nation.

What is a sociopath? Someone with no feelings and incapable of an apology. Read the class action claims. Pick any business sector. It's the same. Almost always, there's no admission of wrongdoing. “Tell me, Clarice—have the lambs stopped screaming?"—Hannibal Lecter, Silence of the Lambs

...My areas of comfort and expertise are the Federalist Papers and the Constitution, mortgages, foreclosures, regulation, fraud, predation, class action claims, disinformation in the media, the corporation as sociopath, economics, and legislative malfeasance. I've read the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. There were no accidents or mistakes, never has been, never will be.

If Tea Party advocates understood the Federalist Papers and the Constitution, they would understand that elitist and mercantile interests usurped the states and individuals. They would understand that Watters v. Wachovia used preemption to crush the states and consumer groups and permitted nationally chartered banks the continued right prey on the vulnerable with no state recourse.

Financial capitalism, not capitalism, is the root of all the evils in America today. Financial capitalism creates and thrives on a synthetic economy. Real capitalism and a real cash based economy may have a slower economic growth, but stability is better than boom and bust. Only the debt-based, synthetic economies of the world are in trouble. Leave the 27 nations that make up the G-20, and visit the country side and small towns. Life is quite good. It's cash based. The material standard of living is lower, but the quality of life appears to be higher. Plenty of pregnant women, which is a signs of confidence in the future.

The current discussions of an asset backed currency are no different from the ones at the turn of the last century with William Jennings Bryan. Fiat money, contrary to what most believe, is not an intrinsic evil. The Roman Empire lasted 1,000 years on fiat money. What's the difference between then and now? The moral character of our leaders - they are worse than the "depraved" Romans. We are doing something similar to what the Byzantines did. The Byzantines required payment in solid gold, but paid out in gold plated coins. The modern day equivalent is what we are now doing with our monetary policy and low rates in order to export our depression. We are repaying Japan and China with dollars that are worth less than the dollars they purchased. This is a sophisticated fraud that masquerades behind the high sounding phrase of "monetary policy." We came off the Bretton Woods international gold standard, because we were over the credit limit due to the cost of the Vietnam War. If you want to blame anyone for America being the hammer of the earth, blame Japan, China, and the Arab world for funding these wars by purchasing U.S. Treasuries. An "elastic" currency, or fiat money, permits the government to become stupid drunk with money for wars and programs even when the tax revenues are not there. This translates into a devaluation of the currency - inflation that has nothing to do with supply and demand as taught in the academic text books. Be ye forewarned - a gold standard only benefits the affluent with assets, not the struggling masses. But, a gold standard, or any standard, tethers fiscal spending and protects the value of a currency so that it can serve as a store house of value for labor, goods, and service.

Monday, November 29, 2010

Sander Hicks joins KB Show Tuesday 11/30

Tuesday, November 30th, 9-10 a.m. Pacific (noon-1 pm Eastern) on, to be archived here a few hours after broadcast...

Guest: Sander Hicks, author of The Big Wedding, 9/11 truth organizer, and independent media entrepreneur. On 9/11/2009 Sander produced the We Demand Transparency conference in New York City and in 2010 he founded the Truth Party and hosted the Truth Gathering.

Sander is currently working on The Catapult Project, and his book on the murder of 9/11 witness Dr. David Graham has just been picked up by "a kick-ass independent publisher"!

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Tuesday's guest: Gordon Duff of Veterans Today

Tuesday, November 16th, 9-11 a.m. Pacific (noon-1 pm Eastern) on, to be archived here a few hours after broadcast...

Guest: Gordon Duff, Marine Combat veteran and editor, Veterans Today - the most widely read - and most fearless - veterans publication in the USA!

Gordon will follow up on my interview with Gen. Hamid Gul, who argued that the 9/11 inside job and the bogus "war on terror" are part of a Zionist/financier attempt to destroy the USA. Gordon develops this argument: In Motion: The Plot to Destroy the United States.

(They've already destroyed our values, our freedom, and our Constitution - see my virally-spreading satirical post TSA Tips for Travelers: Or, How to Stop Worrying and Love Letting Us Touch Your Junk).

Speaking of American decline...was the SoCal mystery missile a Chinese shot across America's bow?

Gordon also has strong opinions about Jews and anti-Semitism, David Irving and the Holocaust issue, and related controversial topics.

We'll also discuss 9/11 truth movement strategy and the amazing Geraldo. On Saturday's show, Tony Szamboti urged us to give newly-minted 9/11 truther Geraldo Rivera the benefit of the doubt. Gordon is a lot more skeptical (see here and here).

Should be a great show!

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Geraldo-educator Tony Szamboti, Pentagon attack expert Barbara Honegger on Truth Jihad Radio

Truth Jihad Radio Sat. 11/13/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page.

First hour: Tony Szamboti returns! Tony had to leave early last week and rush across town to join an amazing Geraldo Rivera WTC-7 episode at the Fox News studio.

Tony Szamboti authored the peer-reviewed Journal of 9/11 Studies paper "The Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis for the Destruction of the Twin Towers." He will be critiquing the Harrit-Rancourt debate and explaining why the Towers must have been demolished with explosives. Tony Szamboti is a Mechanical Design Engineer with over 20 years experience in the Aerospace and Communications industries, responsible for designing a large variety of structures required to perform in dynamic environments. He is a member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Second hour: Pentagon attack expert Barbara Honegger, "founding mother" of the Boston Tea Party for 9/11 Truth - the historic 9/11 truth event that (for better or worse) kicked off the Tea Party movement! (for "worse," scroll down)

Watch my speech at the 2006 Tea Party

Barbara's seminal article "The Pentagon Attack Papers" - just updated a few days ago - shows definitively that the government's version of what happened at the Pentagon is fraudulent. (For supporting evidence, see CIT's National Security Alert, and the work of my Muslims for 9/11 Truth colleague Enver Masud.)

The updated version of The Pentagon Attack Papers includes critically-important all-new material including interviews with former terror czar Richard Clarke and other high-level officials. It is one of the most important pieces of investigative journalism on 9/11 ever produced.

During the interview, Barbara will clarify some confusions that have arisen involving the conflation of her work with the complementary work of CIT, and address the question of why a few key players at 911blogger are using bogus arguments, ad-hominems and outright censorship to attack and suppress research disproving the official version of the Pentagon attack.

Barbara Honegger is one of the most grossly underrated heroes of the 9/11 truth movement. Alongside her high-quality and utterly damning research on the Pentagon and anthrax attacks, Honegger was the key source for Mike Ruppert's work on 9/11 war games - AND the Founding Mother of the Boston Tea Party for 9/11 Truth!

From her bio:

Barbara Honegger worked as a researcher at the Hoover Institution before joining the Ronald Reagan administration as a researcher and policy analyst in 1980. Honegger headed Reagan's gender discrimination agency review before resigning in August, 1983.

While working for Reagan she discovered information that convinced her that George H. W. Bush and William Casey had conspired to make sure that Iran did not release the U.S. hostages until Jimmy Carter had been defeated in the 1980 presidential election.

In 1987 Honegger began leaking information to journalists about the Reagan administration. However, it was not until Reagan left office that Honegger published October Surprise (1989). In her book, Honegger claimed that in 1980 William Casey and other representatives of the Reagan presidential campaign made a deal at two sets of meetings in July and August at the Ritz Hotel in Madrid with Iranians to delay the release of Americans held hostage in Iran until after the November 1980 presidential elections. Reagan’s aides promised that they would get a better deal if they waited until Carter was defeated.

In the years since October Surprise was published other sources such as Ari Ben-Menashe have come forward to confirm Honegger's story.

* * *

Barbara Honegger, Founding Mother of the Tea Party Movement, Demands a Blood Test!

Monday, November 15, 2010

Ken O'Keefe interview from last June replays this Tuesday

Eid Mubarak!

Tuesday, November 16th, 9-11 a.m. Pacific (noon-1 pm Eastern) on, to be archived here a few hours after broadcast...

NoLiesRadio is unable to do a live broadcast this week. (Next week we'll be back live with Gordon Duff of Veterans Today). So for this show we will be replaying Ken O'Keefe's scintillating interview from last June, in honor of his continuing attempts to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza. Ken and the Road to Hope convoy folks were kidnapped last week and taken to Greece, where the Greek commandos in the picture initially pretended to treat them as "terrorists." As of this writing Ken and the others are stuck in Greece, still intending to deliver the aid to Gaza. Ken writes:

I request financial help to cover the very unanticipated costs of this journey. Thank you in advance, to make a donation go to the Paypal link and send to

Thursday, November 11, 2010

WTC Demolition Debate Continues: Bring on the Engineers!

th Jihad Radio Sat. 11/13/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page.

My previous two shows featured physics professor Denis Rancourt and chemistry professor Niels Harrit offering opposing views about what destroyed the Twin Towers. But what do physicists and chemists know? ; - ) Today I'll be talking to the real experts on how buildings stand and fall: engineers.

First hour: Tony Szamboti, author of the peer-reviewed Journal of 9/11 Studies paper "The Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis for the Destruction of the Twin Towers" will be offering his critique of Tuesday's Harrit-Rancourt debate and his reasons why the Towers must have been demolished with explosives. Tony Szamboti is a Mechanical Design Engineer with over 20 years experience in the Aerospace and Communications industries, responsible for designing a large variety of structures required to perform in dynamic environments. He is a member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Second hour: Dwain Deets, former NASA Director of Aerospace Projects. Dwain Deets has given powerpoint presentations on behalf of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth detailing the reasons why the three WTC skyscrapers must have been destroyed in controlled demolitions. He has spoken out on the extremely problematic speeds reported for the aircraft that struck the Twin Towers, calling this issue "the elephant in the living room." He has also endorsed the research of Citizen Investigation Team showing that the government's version of the Pentagon attack is a hoax, and that in all probability a large aircraft flew over the Pentagon at the moment of a carefully timed explosion. Deets' endorsement of CIT, like that of Barrie Zwicker, was censored by the increasingly controversial 9/11 truth website 911blogger, leading Deets to participate in the development of a brand-new alternative 9/11 news site,

Dwain Deets' background:

MS Physics, MS Eng
Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden
Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award
Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988)
Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics
Associate Fellow - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000
Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems
- Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers
Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology
37 year NASA career

Monday, November 8, 2010

The Great Demolition Debate, Pt. 2: Niels Harrit vs. Denis Rancourt

Tuesday, November 9th, 9-11 a.m. Pacific (noon-1 pm Eastern) on, to be archived here a few hours after broadcast...

Special two-hour debate: chemistry professor Niels Harrit, lead author of the "smoking gun of 9/11" nanothermite paper, vs. physics professor Denis Rancourt!

On last Saturday's show (read about it here, and listen here) physics professor/activist Denis Rancourt and I spent the first hour amicably discussing 9/11, and mostly agreeing with each other. During the second hour, we had a heated debate (temperatures almost high enough to vaporize steel!) about what happened to the Twin Towers: I argued that the controlled demolition hypothesis best explains the facts, while Denis, who admits that WTC-7 was a controlled demolition, claimed that the Towers could have collapsed due to plane crashes and fires as the government says.

But wait - what about the unexploded nanothermite chips (making up as much as .1 percent of the WTC dust) found by chemistry professor Niels Harrit and eight other scientists? While I don't know much about chemistry, I'm good at judging arguments. Those who have attacked Dr. Harrit's paper have used such blatantly bad arguments as to have made a prima facie case that the paper is unassailable. Let's see whether Denis Rancourt, who knows something about nanotechnology, can do any better! (I wonder whether he thinks it's a coincidence that much of the NIST cover-up crew, who pretended they had never heard of nanothermite, were in fact nanothermite experts!)

Niels Harrit is an Associate Professor at University of Copenhagen. He is an expert in organic chemistry, photochemistry, fluorescence, and nanotechnology, and the lead author of a potentially historic scientific paper on nanothermite residues in World Trade Center dust.

Denis Rancourt was a tenured professor of physics at the University of Ottawa. His activism on many issues, including the conflict in Occupied Palestine, led to his being fired and dragged off campus in handcuffs by police - an amazing moment in Denis's ongoing academic freedom struggle.

Thursday, November 4, 2010

The Great Demolition Debate, Pt. 1: Physics Prof Denis Rancourt Questions Twin Towers Demolition Hypothesis

th Jihad Radio Sat. 11/6/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page.

Physics professor and academic freedom fighter Denis Rancourt recently came out for 9/11 truth on my radio show. Specifically, Denis agrees that Building 7 was obviously a controlled demolition, that the government's story about the Pentagon attack doesn't withstand scrutiny, and that in general 9/11 featured government "malfeasance" and "coverup." So far so good. Yet for some reason, Denis isn't convinced that the Twin Towers were destroyed in controlled demolitions.

I very rarely find intelligent, open-minded people who are willing to publicly defend the official account of the destruction of the Twin Towers, or take issue with the 9/11 truth movement's alternative explanation. Over the past several years I have been insulted by several colleagues, including physics prof MF Onellian, who are unwilling to debate me or explain why my views are wrong. So it's great to find a free-spirited, highly-qualified guy like Denis who's willing to challenge at least some of my opinions on 9/11!

During this special two-hour interview, Denis Rancourt will present and discuss his views of 9/11. I expect to agree with most of those views. The big exception, of course, is the question of how the Towers were destroyed.

Then, like Woody Allen producing Marshall McLuhan to support his case, on Tuesday I will be welcoming Niels Harrit to debate Denis Rancourt on a special two-hour edition of the Kevin Barrett Show, 11 a.m. to 1 pm Central, on

Let the great demolition debate begin!

Monday, November 1, 2010

Former Head of Pakistani Intelligence Gen. Hamid Gul, Freedom Fighter Ken O'Keefe on the KB Show!

Tuesday, November 2nd, 9-10 a.m. Pacific (noon-1 pm Eastern) on, to be archived here a few hours after broadcast...

Ex-ISI chief General Hamid Gul has long been a brave voice of 9/11 truth, expressing the view of 97% of Pakistanis that al-Qaeda did not do 9/11 as far back as September 26th, 2001, when he pointed out that "Mossad and its American associates are the obvious culprits" - a simple truth that even much of the 9/11 truth movement still doesn't want to hear almost ten years later.

A statesman whose integrity is matched by his strategic vision, Gen. Gul - perhaps the leading architect of the historic victory over the Soviets in Afghanistan (he was then Osama Bin Laden's boss!) - is one of the most impressive political figures of our time. Read his biography here.

Insha'allah Gen. Gul will be joined by ex-Marine world citizen and freedom fighter Ken O'Keefe, hero of the Mavi Marmara. These two former military men, now united in outspoken quests for peace, justice and a better world, should have some interesting things to say to each other!

Unfortunately, Ken O'Keefe may or may not be able to join us, since his Free Gaza convoy is facing slow going in Egypt.

Ken O'Keefe writes:

Road to Hope convoy stalled at Egyptian border

The Road to Hope humanitarian aid convoy continues its role in the international community’s collective mission to break the illegal siege of Gaza and deliver desperately needed aid to the people of Palestine in Gaza. The convoy comprises 30 vehicles and 101 humanitarian aid workers. Among them are 8 survivors of the Israeli attack on the Freedom Flotilla, 7 of them were aboard the Mavi Marmara, including Ken O’Keefe who was involved in disarming two Israeli commandos. The convoy has travelled four and a half thousand miles and is currently located at the Libyan / Egyptian border. As it stands the convoy finds itself at a standstill, with direct communication with the outside world being limited, and access to the internet very difficult.

It has always been a central aspect of the Road to Hope convoy that it acts in a non-political, non-confrontational manner. To work with and cooperate with every government in every country through which it travelled. Thus far this approach has rewarded it with exceptional receptions in every nation. All of the North African governments have been extremely accommodating and the people of each nation even more so. We must give special praise to the Libyan government for its constant support; when the convoy have had challenges, including breakdowns of vehicles, the authorities here have provided the means to repair those vehicles and continue our mission.

Ken O’Keefe: “Now we find ourselves in our third day at the Libyan / Egyptian border and we remain hopeful that the land route will be opened to us in the coming days”. The convoy departed from London with the understanding that the land crossing through Egypt had not been closed to it. Convoy leader, Kieran Turner: “One reason for our optimism that we will travel the land route is the fact that the Al Quds convoy, a Libyan convoy also delivering aid to Gaza, is set to travel the land route in the coming days. For several weeks we have hoped to join our convoys and travel together.” However, the convoy is awaiting permission from the Egyptian authorities to pass through Egypt in this way.

Mr. Turner understands that there is a possibility the Egyptian government will deny the convoy the land route, in which case they will have only two acceptable options —

1) To press on via the land border without permission, at which time our only chance of success will be by way of significant international pressure and a reversal of a policy which tacitly supports the illegal siege of Gaza.

2) If the land route is denied the only remaining option is to deliver our aid by sea. This option inherently requires significant increases in the cost of our mission, and importantly, to all subsequent aid missions. The end result of this policy is a reduction in the already limited resources that can be brought to bear for the people of Palestine.

The convoy leadership urge the Egyptian authorities to allow us safe passage to Gaza by land in the coming days, allow the convoy to join the Al Quds convoy, and ultimately increase the “easing” of the blockade which continues to collectively punish the people of Gaza.

Mr. Ken O’Keefe calls on all the supporters of Palestine “to support Road to Hope and the Al Quds convoys by spreading awareness of our missions and encouraging Egyptian cooperation”.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Monfils Conspiracy, Splitting-the-Sky on Truth Jihad Radio

Truth Jihad Radio Sat. 10/30/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page.

ATTENTION! Due to a denial of service cyber-attack on American Freedom Radio, this show will not be broadcast live. Instead, it will be archived for later listening at the usual place (here).

First hour guests: Exonerated murder-frame-up victim Mike Piaskowski and The Monfils Conspiracy authors Denis Gullickson and John Gaie. Mike Piaskowski ("Mike Pie") spent five-and-a-half years behind bars for a crime he didn't commit...yet his fellow frame-up victims, convicted on exactly the same (non)-evidence, are still rotting in prison. (Read more here.)

Second hour: Civil Resistance icon Splitting-the-Sky updates us on the fallout from his epic "busted-for-trying-to-arrest-George-W.-Bush" trial. (Trial videos here.)

Monday, October 25, 2010

Princeton Prof. Richard Falk, U.N. Human Rights Rapporteur

Tuesday, October 26th, 9-10 a.m. Pacific (noon-1 pm Eastern) on, to be archived here a few hours after broadcast...

Guest: Richard Falk, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights, and Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University; (co-)author/editor of more than forty books.

Richard Falk is one of the great truth-and-justice figures of our time. An enthusiastic endorser of the work of David Ray Griffin, Dr. Falk once made headlines by calling for a study of the neocons' role in 9/11 on my radio show. His work on behalf of the human rights of the Palestinian people has drawn fire from the likes of Alan "Professor Torture" Dershowitz.

Richard Falk pulls no punches describing the Iraq war, saying it is "inescapable that an objective observer would reach the conclusion that this Iraq war is a war of aggression, and as such, that it amounts to a Crime against Peace of the sort for which surviving German leaders were indicted, prosecuted and punished at the Nuremberg trials conducted shortly after the Second World War." (Note: I have been attacked for making this point and standing by it.)

Concerning David Ray Griffin's latest book Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee's Attempt to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory (my review here), Richard Falk writes:

"David Ray Griffin has written a devastating critique of Cass Sunstein's major effort to situate all critics of the official 9/11 story in the garbage pail of 'conspiracy theory.' Bringing to bear his formidable philosophical and theological skills, Griffin brilliantly illuminates this cognitive/political concern, demonstrating that the American people will never find out what really happened on that fateful day until we as citizens insist on considering all available evidence with a fresh and open mind."

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Novelist Mike Palecek, David Ray Griffin's assistant Tod Fletcher on TJ Radio

This just in: Kevin Bracken, the Australian labor leader who just spoke out for 9/11 truth, will be making a cameo appearance on this show!!

Truth Jihad Radio Sat. 10/23/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page.

First hour: Mike Palecek, author of Camp America and twelve other books, most of which are hilarious, mordant, it-only-hurts-when-I-laugh novels. (The others are politically-charged nonfiction.) Mike has gone to prison as a peace protester, run for Congress as a peace candidate, and repeatedly given the world a piece of his mind in his unique writings. I've called him "Iowa's Kilgore Trout" - but that's unfair to Mike, who has more of a social conscience than "Trout". Also, Mike has never stooped to publishing his masterworks in disreputable magazines. Finally, please note that Mike is my kind of 9/11 truth-teller: he uncompromisingly utters the unspeakable with wit, verve, and flat-out take-no-prisoners panache.

Second hour: Tod Fletcher, assistant to Dr. David Ray Griffin. Tod is standing in for Dr. Griffin, who is recovering from a serious illness, for a discussion of DRG's latest book Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee's Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory (read my review here).

Cognitive Infiltration is not only brilliant, but perhaps the best of DRG's books to hand to an intelligent non-9/11-aware person (if any such still exist). Be sure to include a printout of Sunstein's article "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures." If reading Dr. Griffin's book alongside Sunstein's preposterous article doesn't convince your friend that the official version of 9/11 (like its most prestigious defender, Cass Sunstein) stinks to high's time to find a new friend whose brain cells are still firing.

Monday, October 18, 2010

Mickey Huff of Project Censored

Tuesday, October 19th, 9-10 a.m. Pacific (noon-1 pm Eastern) on, to be archived here a few hours after broadcast...

Mickey Huff is lead editor of Censored 2011: The Top 25 Censored Stories of 2009-2010. This is the best Censored yet, featuring a terrific selection of critically important stories that the mainstream media is ignoring, underplaying or distorting...including Increased Tensions with Unresolved 9/11 Issues, David Ray Griffin's Building What? How SCADs Can Be Hidden in Plain Sight, and Lance deHaven-Smith's Beyond Conspiracy Theory: Patterns of High Crime in American Government.

Mickey Huff is associate professor of history at Diablo Valley College. He is Director of Project Censored ( –which was the recipient of the 2008 PEN Oakland National Literary Censorship Award) and is co-editor of Censored 2010 with Peter Phillips and lead editor of Censored 2011. Mickey is an executive committee member of the Media Freedom Foundation and works with Media Freedom International as the Project Censored University Affiliates Coordinator. He is also a former adjunct lecturer in sociology at Sonoma State University, and the previous co-director of the alternative public opinion research agency Retropoll, in Berkeley, CA (

Friday, October 15, 2010

Former Congressman Mark Siljander, GOOOH founder Tim Cox on Truth Jihad Radio

Truth Jihad Radio Sat. 10/16/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or (402) AFR-252, or post your questions to my Facebook page, where Ed Rynearson of RadioDuJour will be putting up hyperlinks about matters under discussion.

First hour: Mark Siljander, former Conservative Christian congressman (R-MI) and author of A Deadly Misunderstanding: A Congressman's Quest to Bridge the Muslim-Christian Divide. Congressman Mark Siljander once despised Islam so much he walked out of a White House prayer breakfast because the prayer was being led by a Muslim! Later, after deeper study of Christianity as well as Islam, he realized how much these two religions have in common, and became a bridge-builder between the faiths and a sort of unofficial (but extremely well-connected) U.S. envoy to various hot spots in the Islamic world. Among other diplomatic miracles, his intervention apparently helped convince Libya to give up its (innocent) Lockerbie suspects and later its nuclear weapons program. The secret? Siljander spoke from the heart and told the Libyans how sorry he was that the US had murdered Col. Qaddafi's baby daughter. (Just think what those magic words "I'm sorry" could accomplish in the case of, say, Israel apologizing to the Palestinians, or the US apologizing to Muslims for the false-flag 9/11 inside job and the War on Islam it launched.)

In 2008, Siljander was indicted on transparently bogus "support for terrorism" charges. It was alleged was that a group he had worked for had also paid money to Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the leading beneficiary of US support in the anti-Soviet Afghan liberation war. Despite Hekmatyar's career as an American ally, he was suddenly redefined as a terrorist, allowing Zionist US Attorney Bradley Schlozman, an unconfirmed Bush appointee in the Justice Department dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy, to launch his bizarre prosecution of Siljander (who was innocent of the Hekmatyar connection, and is deeply opposed to all forms of terrorism).

Why was Siljander set up for politically-motivated prosecution? According to my well-connected sources, the crucifixion of Mark Siljander was a message - a sort of horse's head in the bed - from the Zionist forces behind the 9/11 coup d'├ętat. The message was simple: Get in the way of our War on Islam and you're toast. (For a relatively fair account, check out the Wikipedia entry on Siljander.)

Siljander's book A Deadly Misunderstanding does indeed represent a major obstacle to the War on Islam. I have an Islamic Studies related Ph.D. and have taught introduction to Islam courses at UW-Madison and Edgewood college, and mini-courses at several Wisconsin churches; and never have I seen an approach to real interfaith dialogue as promising as that of Mark Siljander - a true follower of Jesus. Anyone who wants to end the current Wars of Religion (i.e. the 9/11-instigated War on Islam) needs to hear Mark Siljander's amazing message.

Second hour: Tim Cox of GOOOH (Get Out of Our House: A Nonpartisan Plan to Evict the Career Politicians from the U.S. House of Representatives). Tim Cox's plan to radically transform American political culture by evicting the entire House of Representatives has a lot going for it: Simplicity, nonpartisanship, and a feasible organizational strategy. If it works - and it just might, given the ever-growing disillusionment with politics-as-usual - Cox will go down in history as a top-tier American hero. Can he pull it off? Listen to the interview and, if you like what you hear, consider joining GOOOH and working for the (nonviolent) Second American Revolution.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Mark Perkins of Muslim Veterans for 9/11 Truth

Tuesday, October 12th, 9-10 a.m. Pacific (noon-1 pm Eastern) on, to be archived here a few hours after broadcast...

Guest: Muslim Veterans for 9/11 Truth founder Mark Perkins. Mark Perkins, a Marine Corps Sergeant, served in Gulf War I. Today, he - like so many other current and retired members of the US Armed Forces - has awakened to the ugly reality of 9/11 and the Zionist-instigated war on Islam...and is determined to do something about it. To that end, he has founded Muslim Veterans for 9/11 Truth - the name alone would bring a tidal wave of media coverage if we still had a free press.

Stop for a moment and think how you'd feel if you were an American Muslim who had honorably served in the US armed forces...and then along comes the 9/11 inside job with its blood libel against Islam, and its genocidal murder of more than a million Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And speaking of Marine Corps Muslims for 9/11 Truth, check out Muhammad Abdullah, whose 9/11 truth activism made him the target of a politically-motivated DHS raid.